The AI ​​defense supercycle has already begun


Frank Talks: The AI ​​Defense Supercycle Has Already Begun
Frank Talks: The AI ​​Defense Supercycle Has Already Begun Active uses images taken from Shutterstock

Artificial intelligence is no longer just a buzzword. That’s fueling a defense-driven spending boom that investors can’t ignore. In his latest op-ed, Frank Holmes, CEO of Global Investors of America (NASDAQ: GROW )argues that the AI-in-defense supercycle has already begun. From the Pentagon’s recent push to access Entropic chatbot technology to boost corporate AI investment, Holmes outlines why cybersecurity, semiconductors, and data center infrastructure are poised for explosive growth, and why smart investors should pay attention now.

Last week I was at the Money Show in Las Vegas, where I had the pleasure of presenting and participating in a panel on artificial intelligence (AI) and data centers.

It’s always empowering to see familiar faces and meet investors, but what really surprised me was the sheer consistency of the conversation around AI. Every speaker, every panel, every huddle in the hall spoke to the idea that technology is no longer a guessing game.

Instead, the consensus was that AI represented the next big capital spending supercycle. It will shape every industry it touches, and the companies that provide the best and the shovels — chips, cybersecurity, defense tech — are at the center of it.

By now you’ve likely seen the news that the Department of War (DOW) issued an ultimatum to cloud AI chatbot maker Entropy by Friday evening, demanding unrestricted military access to its technology.

When Anthropic backed down—citing its policies against mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons—the Pentagon took its first steps to label the company a “supply chain threat,” a designation typically reserved for hostile foreign entities like Huawei. On Friday, President Donald Trump ordered all government agencies to “immediately cease all use of Anthropic technology,” he wrote on social media.

It’s a fascinating drama, and as an investor, I know that instinct might be to worry. But I want you to look past the noise and ask yourself: What does it tell us that the government is willing to demand wartime production power for access to a chatbot company?

The answer, of course, is that the demand for AI in defense and national security has reached a level that I don’t think most investors have fully priced in.

While the media focused on the Pentagon-anthropic position, a series of less dramatic, but more consequential, developments were quietly revealed.

In January, Secretary of War Pat Hegseth released two major memos that, taken together, represent the Pentagon’s most aggressive AI mission yet.

Add Comment