A senior White House official is pushing back against warnings that stablecoins are draining money from American banks — arguing the opposite is true.
Related reading
Foreign money, domestic income
Patrick Witt, executive director of the White House Digital Assets Advisory Council, posted on X this week that when foreigners convert local currencies into U.S. dollar-denominated stablecoins, that capital flows into the U.S. banking system, not out of it.
Most US stablecoin issuers hold US dollars or Treasury securities as reserves, which means money flows into domestic institutions both ways.
“Global demand for the US dollar is huge,” Witt wrote, calling it new capital flowing into US banks. His comments came amid intense congressional debate over the CLARITY Act and the GENIUS Act, both designed to provide a clearer regulatory framework for the crypto industry.
Lost in the rewards/yield debate is how compatible GENIUS stablecoins actually lead to deposit inflows.
Global demand for US dollars is high. Foreigners exchange local currency for US-issued stablecoins.
This is net new capital flowing into the American banking system.
— Patrick Witt (@patrickjwitt) March 12, 2026
Fear behind legislation
Not everyone shares this opinion. Standard Chartered, in a recent research note, estimated that increased stablecoin adoption could reduce US bank deposits by about one-third of the total stablecoin market.
For community banks that fund local mortgages and small business loans with those savings, that number is hard to ignore.
Christopher Williston, president of the Texas Association of Independent Bankers, made the case public last Friday.
By giving ground on CLARITY Act negotiations, he warned, local lending and community economic productivity are at risk. The crypto industry quickly bounced back.
Austin Campbell, founder of Zero Knowledge Consulting, argued that if small banks and the crypto sector can’t find common ground, the real winners will be large financial institutions – those with enough resources to overcome regulatory resistance.
Witt echoed this sentiment, writing in X that watching the two sides fight felt like watching “an arsonist threaten to burn down his house.”
Related reading
Dollar weakness adds urgency
The debate is taking place against the backdrop of a volatile US dollar. The U.S. dollar index fell to 95,818 on Jan. 28, its lowest point in four years, before recovering to 99,468, a gain of about 3.80 percent, according to TradingView. It has gained 0.46% in the five days prior to the release.
Witt’s argument is related to international demand. If foreign appetite for dollar-denominated stablecoins grows, inflows to U.S. banks could outweigh any changes in domestic deposits, he said. Whether Congress finds the case persuasive enough to act remains to be seen.
Featured image from World, chart from TradingView
