New CEO Greg Abel did not list 2 of Berkshire Hathaway’s largest equity positions as “core holdings.” Are they on the chopping block?


brand new Berkshire Hathaway CEO Greg Abel began his tenure as the company’s new chairman in an 18-page letter to shareholders that sheds light on many details about how Abel plans to run the broader company, how Berkshire currently operates, how it’s positioned for the future, and other, perhaps surprising comments about Berkshire’s $8 billion, $31 billion megaproject plans.

For example, Abel identified four key positions in Berkshire’s portfolio — Appl, American Express, coca colaand Moody’s — that he expects will “combine over decades” and experience “limited performance,” without any fundamental change in their long-term prospects. What is equally interesting is that Abel did not include two of Berkshire’s current top five positions in the group. Are these two stocks now on the chopping block?

Will AI create the world’s first trillionaire? Our team just published a report on a little-known company, called “Essential Dependency” that provides critical technology to both Nvidia and Intel. Continue »

Man looking at laptop, on phone.
Image source: Getty Images.

A stock not mentioned as a “main holding” by Abel Bank of America (NYSE: BAC )the second largest bank in the United States by assets and the fourth largest position in Berkshire’s portfolio. While dumping much of its bank stock during the pandemic, Berkshire loaded up on Bank of America, indicating it would be its top big bank. While Buffett and Berkshire have a long history with the banking sector, they have also clearly hurt the industry.

Berkshire has also cut its stake in Bank of America in half over the past few years. In 2011, after the Great Recession, Berkshire invested $5 billion in Bank of America, in exchange for preferred stock and warrants that allowed it to acquire 700 million common shares at $7.14 each in 2017, so Bank of America was undoubtedly a great investment for Berkshire.

However, Berkshire may not consider banks as long-term businesses as they once were. The sector has been struggling since the Great Recession and has lagged the broader market in terms of net returns. If Berkshire is worried about the crisis, which it seems to be based on its cash hoards and lack of buyback activity in recent years, it might want to shore up its banking as well.

Now, that doesn’t mean that Berkshire will necessarily destroy Bank of America, but the fact that it doesn’t list the company among its core holdings and has sold a significant amount certainly puts it on the chopping block. The stock trades at about 175% of Bank of America’s book value, or net worth, which is at the high end of its 10-year valuation range, though not the top, so Berkshire may ultimately prefer to find banks with cheaper valuations.

(translating tags) Greg Abel

Add Comment