NASA scraps 2027 Artemis III lunar landing in favor of 2028 mission


NASA scraps 2027 Artemis III lunar landing in favor of the 2028 mission

The announcement that NASA will rejig Artemis III not landing on the moon in 2027 came after the agency’s Artemis II the mission ran into problems, which delayed the launch

NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman

NASA will not land astronauts on the moon in 2027, space agency administrator Jared Isaacman announced Friday. Instead, the agency will change the planned Artemis III missions to test capabilities in orbit such as using the astronauts’ spacesuits in microgravity and rendezvous with at least one of the spacecraft that NASA hopes to use as a lunar lander.

NASA will then attempt two manned lunar landings in 2028 as part of Artemis IV and Artemis V. The decision represents a major timetable shift for the agency, which has been pushing for years Artemis III the mission that will land astronauts on the moon for the first time in more than half a century.

The announcement comes after NASA’s upcoming Artemis II the mission encountered several problems with its rocket, the Space Launch System (SLS), last week. As a result, NASA has had to scrap a Mars launch target, which already represented a delay from the original timeline. The SLS, which now has problems with helium flow, had already encountered hydrogen leaks and other problems that had caused the launch window to slip earlier this year — and similar issues had caused months of delays for the rocket’s first launch in the unmanned Artemis I mission. The next launch window for Artemis II opens at the beginning of April.


On supporting science journalism

If you like this article, please consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribes. By purchasing a subscription, you help secure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas that shape our world today.


At a news conference Friday, Isaacman said NASA was convinced that increasing the cadence of SLS launches to once every 10 months or so would result in less risk and greater mission success.

“I’m excited because I think we have a path here to actually get the job done in the time frames that we’ve targeted now,” Isaacman said. NASA needs to rebuild its “core competencies,” he said, adding that the agency will work to standardize SLS production so that the time between launches can be reduced as much as possible. Currently, the period between the last SLS launch for Artemis I and the upcoming missions will be more than three years.

“It’s just a straight-up crazy way to do this,” Isaacman said. “Launching every three years and … massive changes in the configuration of the vehicle is not a recipe for success.”

Editor’s Note (2/27/26): This is a developing story and may be updated.

It’s time to stand up for science

If you liked this article, I would like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in its two-century history.

I have been one Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I see the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does for you too.

If you subscribe to Scientific Americanyou help ensure our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten laboratories across the United States; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself is too often not recognised.

In return, you receive important news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-see videos, challenging games, and the world of science’s best writing and reporting. You can even give someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science is important. I hope you will support us in that mission.

Add Comment