Why does every blockchain suddenly want their own Perp Dex


In the latest crypto infrastructure race, blockchains are competing to host a perpetual futures exchange. Many are now starting or incubating decentralized derivatives markets themselves, even as centralized platforms dominate.

Derivatives make up a large portion of today’s crypto trading activity, often accounting for a large portion of the total volume. According to CryptoQuant, spot Bitcoin (BTC) trading volume on centralized exchanges reached around 55,230 BTC on Tuesday, while derivatives volume was over 506,600 BTC.

Bitcoin derivatives volumes consistently exceed spot volumes. Source: CryptoQuant

According to Nina Rong, CEO of BNB Chain Development, decentralized permanent exchanges, or perp DEXs, now act as basic infrastructure because they give traders, market makers and institutional participants access to leveraged products.

“When these players are active on a chain, they generate liquidity, hedging activity and arbitrage flows that significantly increase the overall volume of the onchain and strengthen the business environment of the ecosystem,” he told Cointelegraph.

While several blockchains are exploring their own derivatives venues, launching one does not automatically translate into meaningful or sustainable trading activity. Derivatives liquidity has historically been concentrated around a small number of dominant exchanges, rather than evenly across platforms.

Blockchains are starting to build their own DEXs

The logic is very simple. If derivatives gain a large share of crypto trading volume, perp DEX could help the blockchain attract more trading activity.

“In many ways, it has become a competitive race: chains with the largest number of successful derivatives platforms are more likely to attract and retain more trading volume in their ecosystem,” Rong said.

For BNB Chain, this platform is Aster. It had the second-highest open interest among DEXs on Thursday, according to DefiLlama. Rong claimed that Aster’s rise has helped BNB’s ability to maintain market share.

Aster is second in DEX ranking after Hyperliquid. Source: DefiLlama

Some chains actively incubate perp DEX instead of waiting for an external group to choose their network to build them. One such example is Decibel, which aired on Aptos’ main channel on February 26.

“What you’re seeing in the crypto ecosystem as a whole is different L1s and different blockchains thinking about what they’re actually using the block space for,” Briley Whatley, head of the Decibel Foundation, told Cointelegraph.

Aptos recently got their DEX perp as Decibel went live. Source: Decibel

“Many L1 teams are realizing that they are in the best position to understand the mechanics of their chains and build applications on top of them,” he said.

related to: Aster’s delisting exposes DeFi’s growing integrity crisis

Whatley added that Decibel itself is not part of the latest rush by blockchains to build a DEX perp. Aptos has been incubating Decibel for about a year, before Hyperliquid, Aster, and Lighter battle it out for market dominance.

Liquidity tends to cluster around dominant locations

Launching a perp DEX does not guarantee an eternal fountain of liquidity. Historically, derivatives trading has tended to cluster around a few platforms, according to Stefan Lutz, CEO of BitMEX.

“All markets (derivatives and spot) rely on market makers and strong risk management systems. These participants tend to favor platforms that already have liquidity and a track record,” Lutz told Cointelegraph.

This means that in the long run it is inefficient to allocate trading slots to a single chain or coin. Given that traders often trade through multiple chains and coins, we believe that consolidation is a natural process.

A similar pattern has played out in traditional financial markets over the past three decades. The shift to electronic trading in the 1990s led to a wave of alternative exchanges and platforms entering the market. According to research published by the Bank for International Settlements, over time liquidity has often consolidated around places with deeper order books, lower spreads and more reliable infrastructure.

The Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) dominates most of the US futures market on TradFi today. The Intercontinental Exchange is the leader in energy derivatives and the Eurex Exchange is a major venue for European index futures.

In crypto, the majority of Bitcoin and Ether (ETH) derivatives trading has historically been concentrated on a few exchanges such as Binance, OKX, Bybit and Deribit. Recently, decentralized platforms such as Hyperliquid have emerged as important players for futures activity.

Deribit leads the crypto options market for Bitcoin and Ether. Source: Kaiko

Centralized exchanges still provide advantages such as order processing, risk management, liquidity and trading infrastructure, while fully onchain platforms are limited by lock-in times that lead to delays and slippage, Sidra Fariq, head of retail sales at Deribit, told Cointelegraph.

“Additionally, centralized exchanges can offer greater privacy, which is important to institutional traders,” he said.

Meanwhile, proponents of onchain exchanges argue that decentralization and consolidation allow derivatives liquidity to be embedded within specific ecosystems.

related to: Why institutions prefer Ethereum despite faster blockchains

“Your order book is on the blockchain and is verifiable, and order matching is based on price and time priority set by the blockchain itself,” said Decibel’s Whatley.

“When you send an order, you know exactly how it fits, and it goes into the order book fairly, instead of being shipped somewhere else,” he said.

The “U” Shape of Derivatives Markets

The long-term picture for derivatives may depend on whether perp DEXs differ across networks or simply replicate the same product. BNB Chain’s Rong said that networks that offer different features can have an advantage.

“Chains win by offering unique product opportunities or distinctive retail locations that aren’t available anywhere else,” he said. But if similar platforms appear everywhere, “the result is likely to be fragmentation across multiple ecosystems, rather than one dominant hub.”

At the same time, market dynamics may eventually shift liquidity back to a smaller set of venues. BitMEX’s Lutz said market makers and professional traders tend to cluster, where they can efficiently deploy capital and manage risk across multiple assets without jumping between platforms.

“If liquidity is spread too much across multiple derivatives platforms, it often leads to wide spreads and volatile markets,” he said.

This dynamic could create what Lutz posits as a circular pattern for ecosystems experimenting with their derivative platforms.

“We expect a U-shaped technical liquidity development in an ecosystem,” he said, where new venues initially see a surge in activity before slowing down.

Fixed futures markets now influence where liquidity is generated, how traders hedge risk, and which platforms dominate trading activity. As blockchains compete to host these markets, derivatives trading will increasingly become the core infrastructure of crypto ecosystems.

Magazine: The Debate About Bitcoin’s Four-Year Cycle Is Over: Benjamin Cowen