-
Exxon ( XOM ) and Chevron ( CVX ) each rose 3.5% Sunday night but gained just 0.18% and 0.06% Monday night as oil held at $77, up 9.5%. Exxon is up 27.15% year-to-date, Chevron is up 26%.
-
Exxon and Chevron have restructured to grow at low oil prices through cost-cutting and volume growth, meaning short-term geopolitical spikes are increasing margins rather than saving profits.
-
An analyst named NVIDIA just named his top 10 AI stocks in 2010. Get it for free here.
CNBC’s Brian Sullivan stepped in front of the camera Monday morning with an observation about how energy investing has changed. “Look at crude oil, it’s up 9.5%, but it’s not at $125 a barrel. You’ve got Exxon up half a percent, Chevron up a quarter of 1%. The markets are down a little bit but they’re not collapsing. That’s a big difference from what we had last night.”
He’s right, and the gap between those two numbers tells you something important about how the big oil companies are doing today.
Context is important here. On Sunday night, oil futures broke above $100 a barrel amid geopolitical shock, sending ExxonMobil and Chevron each down nearly 3.5% in after-hours trade, a classic panicked commodity reaction.
READ: The analyst named NVIDIA in 2010 Just naming his top 10 AI stocks
By Monday morning, the panic was repeated. Crude oil remained higher at $77 a barrel in Brent – still a meaningful gain of 9.5% – but energy majors were hardly beaten. ExxonMobil rose 0.18% and Chevron rose even less, 0.06%, reflecting how much of the overnight shock was absorbed when US markets opened.
This consistency is the story that Sullivan refers to, and it reflects some structure, not randomness.
The old mental model for energy stocks was simple: oil goes up, stocks go up. This relationship has weakened significantly, and the reason is that ExxonMobil and Chevron have deliberately reduced their sensitivity to each point on the commodity curve over the past few years.
ExxonMobil has accumulated $15.1 billion in total construction cost savings since 2019, with a target of $20 billion by 2030. The company set a production record of 4.7 million barrels of oil equivalent per day, the highest in 40 years. But it also generates meaningful revenue from refining and chemicals, segments that don’t always move in lockstep with crude prices. In 4Q 2025, ExxonMobil’s energy products revenue rose more than 80% sequentially to $3.39 billion on strong refining margins, even as pressures from crude realities remain.
Chevron tells the same story. In Q4 2025, its average Brent crude oil fetch was $64 per barrel, much lower than the $75 it fetched a year earlier. Yet the company still posted a record full-year production of 3,723 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day, up 12% year-over-year, and generated record full-year operating cash flow of $33.90 billion. Volume growth offsets price weakness. This is the hedge.
Both stocks made strong returns well before today’s oil rally. ExxonMobil is up 27.15% year over year and 44% year over year. The market has been pricing in corrected fundamentals for months, not just reacting to today’s crude movement. Chevron followed a similar path, up 26% year-to-date, reflecting investor confidence in the company’s volume-driven revenue model rather than pure commodity exposure.
For investors trying to understand how to position themselves around oil shocks, a key concept is breakeven cost. A decade ago, most major oil projects needed $70 to $80 per barrel just to generate positive revenue. At today’s cost structures, ExxonMobil and Chevron generate significant free cash flow at very low prices. ExxonMobil just posted $5.57 billion in free cash flow in Q4 2025, a quarter when Brent averaged just $64 per barrel. Chevron generated $16.60 billion in free cash flow for the full year under the same pricing environment.
This means that when oil peaks at $77 or even $90, these companies are already profitable and cash producers. When oil peaks at $77 or even $90, these companies reap increased margins on top of an already profitable cost structure. Spike adds to earnings; It does not save them. Stock market prices relative to expected future earnings, and if the base case already assumes a reasonable profit, a short-term increase in oil moves the needle less than it once did.
It also explains why stocks don’t fall when oil falls. Chevron’s full-year net income fell 30% year over year in 2025 despite record production, as lower prices cut into margins. But the company still returned $27.10 billion to shareholders through dividends and buybacks. ExxonMobil has completed a $20 billion share repurchase in 2025 and plans another $20 billion through 2026. This promise of return on capital acts as a floor under the stock price.
Sullivan’s point is the right framework for long-term investors rather than exaggerating about stock “generosity.” Whether you own ExxonMobil or Chevron for years of income and capital appreciation, the rise of geopolitical oil is noise. Contributions are what matter. ExxonMobil has raised its dividend for 43 consecutive years, paying $1.03 per share in the quarter. Chevron has increased its dividend for 39 consecutive years, paying $1.78 per share quarterly. These lines have survived oil accidents, crises and global pandemics. A 9.5% one-day move in crude oil does not threaten them.
For short-term traders looking to invest in oil spikes, the profit they seek lies elsewhere. Companies are built for flexibility over commodity cycles. Traders seeking maximum leverage in crude prices will find it in smaller E&P names, oil futures, or upstream-focused ETFs.
Market conditions add another layer. The VIX, a measure of expected stock market volatility, sat at 29.49 on Friday, up sharply from 18.63 just two weeks ago. Elevated fear in the broader market puts a cap on energy stock gains even when oil fundamentals are strong, as institutional investors manage total portfolio risk, not just sector exposure.
The geopolitical premium on oil is real right now. Brent has risen from around $61 in early January to $77 in early March, a move driven by fears of supply disruptions rather than demand growth. Goldman Sachs has forecast oil prices to reach $100 a barrel due to continued geopolitical pressure, while Morgan Stanley has flagged the possibility of an LNG shortage if Middle East tensions persist.
If this scenario plays out, ExxonMobil and Chevron will benefit, but the benefit will show up in quarterly earnings reports, not in single-session stock movements. CEO Mike Wirth noted that 2025 was a year of “best shareholder returns despite industry-leading free cash flow growth and lower oil prices.” This structure captures a structural change: these companies are now competing in operational execution, not just where crude oil is traded today.
Sullivan’s observation is worth internalizing. A 9.5% oil movement that produces a 10% stock movement is the system working as designed. Big companies have built businesses that don’t need $125 oil to thrive, and the market knows that.
Wall Street is pouring billions into AI, but many investors are buying the wrong stocks. The analyst who first identified NVIDIA as a buyback in 2010 — before its 28,000% run — has identified just 10 new AI companies that he believes can deliver returns beyond that point. One dominates the $100 billion equipment market. Bill addresses the single biggest obstacle to maintaining AI data centers. The third segment is a net play in the optical network market that is quadrupling. Most investors haven’t heard of half of these names. Get a free list of all 10 stocks here.
